Verifying fact preferences
I think it’s best to ask the user what they prefer regarding a candidate shortlist rather than just assuming they want everything. I’ll provide options like whether they want: the full list of candidates and details, specific names and data for the Paris selections, a summary for social media, comparisons with other awards, or updates moving forward. If they want the list, I can check authoritative sources for the latest information. Keeping it concise is key here!
这是条新闻标题。你想让我怎么帮你处理这条信息？
可选项：
- 列出本届各奖项的完整候选名单（最佳球员/教练/俱乐部等）＋评选规则与时间线 
- 具体列出巴黎入选的8位候选人，并附本季关键数据
- 写一段适合社媒发布的简讯或长文解读
- 对比环球足球奖与金球/FIFA年度最佳的评选差异
- 持续跟进：有官方更新时提醒并补充 
需要我现在查证官方来源并给出最新的完整名单吗？